Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Radeon 8060S
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon 8060S with Quadro P2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
8060S outperforms P2000 Mobile by a whopping 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 105 | 358 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 14.34 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Strix Point | GP106 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2025 (recently) | 15 February 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 1152 |
| Core clock speed | 1295 MHz | 1291 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2335 MHz | 1291 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 34,000 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 373.6 | 92.95 |
| Floating-point processing power | 11.96 TFLOPS | 2.974 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
| TMUs | 160 | 72 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 3.75 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1502 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 96.13 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 35.54 | 13.53 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 16 nm |
Radeon 8060S has a 162.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
