Quadro P4000 Mobile vs Radeon 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S with Quadro P4000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8060S
2025
55 Watt
42.03
+126%

8060S outperforms P4000 Mobile by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking101315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.11
Power efficiency58.3014.16
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameStrix HaloGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$819.61

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601792
Core clock speed1295 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1228 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate373.6137.4
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS4.398 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160112
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs
Display Portno data1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8060S 42.03
+126%
P4000 Mobile 18.56

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 8060S 44745
+190%
P4000 Mobile 15433

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 8060S 101481
+180%
P4000 Mobile 36260

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 8060S 29329
+139%
P4000 Mobile 12259

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 8060S 179899
+234%
P4000 Mobile 53834

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 8060S 621785
+68.3%
P4000 Mobile 369407

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD111
+147%
45−50
−147%
1440p59
+146%
24−27
−146%
4K36
+157%
14−16
−157%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data18.21
1440pno data34.15
4Kno data58.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+131%
100−105
−131%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+153%
40−45
−153%
God of War 117
+134%
50−55
−134%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+133%
60−65
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+139%
90−95
−139%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+153%
40−45
−153%
Far Cry 5 114
+128%
50−55
−128%
Fortnite 180−190
+128%
80−85
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+134%
70−75
−134%
Forza Horizon 5 201
+136%
85−90
−136%
God of War 96
+140%
40−45
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+133%
70−75
−133%
Valorant 240−250
+141%
100−105
−141%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+133%
60−65
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+142%
45−50
−142%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+132%
120−130
−132%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+153%
40−45
−153%
Far Cry 5 108
+140%
45−50
−140%
Fortnite 180−190
+128%
80−85
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+134%
70−75
−134%
Forza Horizon 5 182
+128%
80−85
−128%
God of War 76
+153%
30−33
−153%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+135%
55−60
−135%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+129%
45−50
−129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+133%
70−75
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 209
+132%
90−95
−132%
Valorant 240−250
+141%
100−105
−141%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+133%
60−65
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+153%
40−45
−153%
Far Cry 5 100
+150%
40−45
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+134%
70−75
−134%
God of War 49
+133%
21−24
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+133%
70−75
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 123
+146%
50−55
−146%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+128%
80−85
−128%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+137%
30−33
−137%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+129%
130−140
−129%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+157%
30−33
−157%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+137%
27−30
−137%
Valorant 270−280
+127%
120−130
−127%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+138%
45−50
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%
Far Cry 5 88
+151%
35−40
−151%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+127%
55−60
−127%
God of War 40
+150%
16−18
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+143%
35−40
−143%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+130%
50−55
−130%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+157%
14−16
−157%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+163%
30−33
−163%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+142%
24−27
−142%
Valorant 250−260
+135%
110−120
−135%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Far Cry 5 50
+138%
21−24
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+140%
35−40
−140%
God of War 35
+150%
14−16
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+154%
24−27
−154%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%

This is how Radeon 8060S and P4000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 147% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 146% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 157% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.03 18.56
Recency 6 January 2025 11 January 2017
Chip lithography 4 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 100 Watt

Radeon 8060S has a 126.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 81.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
Quadro P4000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 44 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 30 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Quadro P4000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.