Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs 8050S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8050S with Radeon Pro Vega 64X, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8050S
2025
55 Watt
36.17
+19.6%

8050S outperforms Pro 64X by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking130189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency52.959.74
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameStrix HaloVega 10
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)19 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484096
Core clock speed1295 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed2800 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate358.4375.8
Floating-point processing power11.47 TFLOPS12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128256
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cache8 MB4 MB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.1.125

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8050S 36.17
+19.6%
Pro Vega 64X 30.23

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8050S 15996
+19.6%
Samples: 71
Pro Vega 64X 13369
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD94
+25.3%
75−80
−25.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+25.3%
170−180
−25.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+20%
110−120
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+25.3%
170−180
−25.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
Far Cry 5 100
+25%
80−85
−25%
Fortnite 160−170
+28.5%
130−140
−28.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+24.2%
120−130
−24.2%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+22%
100−105
−22%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+26.7%
120−130
−26.7%
Valorant 220−230
+25%
180−190
−25%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+20%
110−120
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+25.3%
170−180
−25.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+20.9%
230−240
−20.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
Far Cry 5 96
+20%
80−85
−20%
Fortnite 160−170
+28.5%
130−140
−28.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+24.2%
120−130
−24.2%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+22%
100−105
−22%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+24.2%
95−100
−24.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+22.7%
75−80
−22.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+26.7%
120−130
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+20%
130−140
−20%
Valorant 220−230
+25%
180−190
−25%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+20%
110−120
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
Far Cry 5 85
+21.4%
70−75
−21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+24.2%
120−130
−24.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+26.7%
120−130
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+22.7%
75−80
−22.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+28.5%
130−140
−28.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+21.3%
80−85
−21.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+22.3%
220−230
−22.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+21.5%
65−70
−21.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Valorant 250−260
+22.4%
210−220
−22.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+23.8%
80−85
−23.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+24%
75−80
−24%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+22.2%
90−95
−22.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+20%
85−90
−20%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+22%
50−55
−22%
Valorant 230−240
+23.7%
190−200
−23.7%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+22%
50−55
−22%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%

This is how Radeon 8050S and Pro Vega 64X compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is 25% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.17 30.23
Recency 6 January 2025 19 March 2019
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 250 Watt

Radeon 8050S has a 19.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 354.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 64X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8050S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 37 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or Radeon Pro Vega 64X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.