Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S and Iris Plus Graphics 645, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8060S
2025
55 Watt
42.18
+912%

8060S outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 645 by a whopping 912% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97701
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency58.4121.18
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameStrix HaloCoffee Lake GT3e
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed1295 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate373.650.40
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs646
TMUs16048
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8060S 42.18
+912%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 4.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8060S 17677
+911%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 1749

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 8060S 40732
+1265%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 2985

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 8060S 27659
+1361%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 1893

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+408%
26
−408%
1440p79
+1029%
7−8
−1029%
4K52
+940%
5−6
−940%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+1183%
18−20
−1183%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1163%
8−9
−1163%
God of War 117
+1070%
10−11
−1070%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+724%
16−18
−724%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+1094%
18−20
−1094%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1163%
8−9
−1163%
Far Cry 5 106
+715%
12−14
−715%
Fortnite 180−190
+628%
24−27
−628%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+720%
20−22
−720%
Forza Horizon 5 201
+1727%
10−12
−1727%
God of War 96
+860%
10−11
−860%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+859%
16−18
−859%
Valorant 240−250
+332%
55−60
−332%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+724%
16−18
−724%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+506%
18−20
−506%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+271%
75−80
−271%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1163%
8−9
−1163%
Far Cry 5 104
+700%
12−14
−700%
Fortnite 180−190
+628%
24−27
−628%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+720%
20−22
−720%
Forza Horizon 5 182
+1555%
10−12
−1555%
God of War 76
+660%
10−11
−660%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+807%
14−16
−807%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+1188%
8−9
−1188%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+859%
16−18
−859%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 218
+1717%
12−14
−1717%
Valorant 240−250
+332%
55−60
−332%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+724%
16−18
−724%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1163%
8−9
−1163%
Far Cry 5 97
+646%
12−14
−646%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+720%
20−22
−720%
God of War 49
+390%
10−11
−390%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+859%
16−18
−859%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 114
+850%
12−14
−850%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+628%
24−27
−628%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+788%
8−9
−788%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+831%
30−35
−831%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+1650%
4−5
−1650%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+2033%
3−4
−2033%
Valorant 270−280
+504%
45−50
−504%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+5250%
2−3
−5250%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Far Cry 5 89
+1171%
7−8
−1171%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+1150%
10−11
−1150%
God of War 40
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+1600%
5−6
−1600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+1338%
8−9
−1338%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+375%
16−18
−375%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
Valorant 250−260
+1129%
21−24
−1129%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Far Cry 5 49
+1533%
3−4
−1533%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1580%
5−6
−1580%
God of War 35
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+1350%
4−5
−1350%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 29
+0%
29
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Radeon 8060S and Iris Plus Graphics 645 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 408% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 1029% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 940% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 8060S is 5250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is ahead in 55 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.18 4.17
Recency 6 January 2025 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 8060S has a 911.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Plus Graphics 645, on the other hand, has 266.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 645 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 39 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 122 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Iris Plus Graphics 645, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.