Radeon 8060S vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile and Radeon 8060S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
42.30
+0.8%

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms 8060S by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.02no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameGA104Strix Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores56322560
Core clock speed915 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2335 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Wattno data
Texture fill rate248.2373.6
Floating-point processing power15.88 TFLOPS11.96 TFLOPS
ROPs8064
TMUs176160
Tensor Cores176no data
Ray Tracing Cores4440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 42.30
+0.8%
Radeon 8060S 41.97

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 17724
+0.8%
Radeon 8060S 17589

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 36970
Radeon 8060S 40732
+10.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 81895
Radeon 8060S 96996
+18.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 27776
+0.4%
Radeon 8060S 27659

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 141689
Radeon 8060S 164040
+15.8%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 581927
Radeon 8060S 581927

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
−11.9%
132
+11.9%
1440p72
−9.7%
79
+9.7%
4K47
−10.6%
52
+10.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+1.3%
230−240
−1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 129
+7.5%
120−130
−7.5%
Sons of the Forest 90−95
+5.9%
85−90
−5.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+7.7%
130−140
−7.7%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+1.3%
230−240
−1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 111
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Far Cry 5 138
+6.2%
130−140
−6.2%
Fortnite 180−190
+1.7%
180−190
−1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+2.5%
160−170
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+2.3%
130−140
−2.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
Sons of the Forest 85
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%
Valorant 240−250
+0.8%
240−250
−0.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+7.7%
130−140
−7.7%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+1.3%
230−240
−1.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+3%
270−280
−3%
Cyberpunk 2077 89
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Dota 2 146
+4.3%
140−150
−4.3%
Far Cry 5 131
+9.2%
120−130
−9.2%
Fortnite 180−190
+1.7%
180−190
−1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+2.5%
160−170
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 5 124
+3.3%
120−130
−3.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+8.5%
130−140
−8.5%
Metro Exodus 95
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
Sons of the Forest 83
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+4.4%
180−190
−4.4%
Valorant 240−250
+0.8%
240−250
−0.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+7.7%
130−140
−7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Dota 2 138
+6.2%
130−140
−6.2%
Far Cry 5 122
+1.7%
120−130
−1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+2.5%
160−170
−2.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
Sons of the Forest 82
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+3%
100−105
−3%
Valorant 193
+1.6%
190−200
−1.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+1.7%
180−190
−1.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+3.1%
290−300
−3.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+4.4%
90−95
−4.4%
Metro Exodus 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 270−280
+1.1%
270−280
−1.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+7%
100−105
−7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 100
+5.3%
95−100
−5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+4.2%
120−130
−4.2%
Sons of the Forest 66
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+4.5%
110−120
−4.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Valorant 250−260
+3.2%
250−260
−3.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Dota 2 128
+6.7%
120−130
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Sons of the Forest 44
+10%
40−45
−10%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%

This is how RTX 3070 Ti Mobile and Radeon 8060S compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 12% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 10% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.30 41.97
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 8060S, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile and Radeon 8060S.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1008 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 36 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile or Radeon 8060S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.