Arc A370M vs Radeon 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S and Arc A370M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8060S
2025
55 Watt
42.18
+245%

8060S outperforms Arc A370M by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency58.4226.58
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameStrix HaloDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed1295 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate373.699.20
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064
Ray Tracing Cores408

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8060S 42.18
+245%
Arc A370M 12.21

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8060S 17677
+246%
Arc A370M 5115

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 8060S 40732
+237%
Arc A370M 12090

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 8060S 27659
+239%
Arc A370M 8149

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 8060S 164040
+361%
Arc A370M 35604

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD106
+172%
39
−172%
1440p57
+185%
20
−185%
4K36
+5.9%
34
−5.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+235%
65−70
−235%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+120%
46
−120%
God of War 117
+234%
35
−234%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+159%
50−55
−159%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+212%
65−70
−212%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+173%
37
−173%
Far Cry 5 106
+116%
49
−116%
Fortnite 180−190
+153%
70−75
−153%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+209%
50−55
−209%
Forza Horizon 5 201
+429%
35−40
−429%
God of War 96
+210%
31
−210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+262%
45−50
−262%
Valorant 240−250
+122%
100−110
−122%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+159%
50−55
−159%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+58%
65−70
−58%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+58%
170−180
−58%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+304%
25
−304%
Far Cry 5 104
+126%
46
−126%
Fortnite 180−190
+153%
70−75
−153%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+209%
50−55
−209%
Forza Horizon 5 182
+379%
35−40
−379%
God of War 76
+204%
25
−204%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+338%
29
−338%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+203%
34
−203%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+262%
45−50
−262%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 218
+311%
53
−311%
Valorant 240−250
+122%
100−110
−122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+159%
50−55
−159%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+381%
21
−381%
Far Cry 5 97
+126%
43
−126%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+209%
50−55
−209%
God of War 49
+172%
18
−172%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+262%
45−50
−262%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 114
+338%
26
−338%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+153%
70−75
−153%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+196%
24−27
−196%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+217%
90−95
−217%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+536%
11
−536%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+220%
20
−220%
Valorant 270−280
+106%
130−140
−106%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+215%
30−35
−215%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+410%
10−11
−410%
Far Cry 5 89
+207%
29
−207%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
God of War 40
+233%
12
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+372%
18−20
−372%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+326%
27−30
−326%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+414%
7−8
−414%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+217%
24−27
−217%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+256%
16−18
−256%
Valorant 250−260
+285%
65−70
−285%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+300%
16−18
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Far Cry 5 49
+277%
12−14
−277%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+300%
21−24
−300%
God of War 35
+289%
9−10
−289%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+408%
12−14
−408%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+383%
12−14
−383%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 68
+0%
68
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%

This is how Radeon 8060S and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 172% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 185% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 8060S is 536% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is ahead in 59 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.18 12.21
Recency 6 January 2025 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 35 Watt

Radeon 8060S has a 245.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has 57.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 40 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 187 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.