RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Radeon 780M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 780M with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 780M
2024
15 Watt
15.68

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms 780M by a whopping 382% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3509
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.36
Power efficiency84.1210.13
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code namePhoenixGB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2024 (1 year ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76824064
Core clock speed800 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate139.21,968
Floating-point processing power8.909 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs48752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Cores12188
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB23.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared96 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 780M 15.68
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 75.51
+382%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 780M Samples: 6588 6932
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Samples: 42 33392
+382%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−357%
160−170
+357%
1440p22
−355%
100−110
+355%
4K13
−362%
60−65
+362%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data53.53
1440pno data85.65
4Kno data142.75

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 119
−362%
550−600
+362%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
−362%
180−190
+362%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
−357%
160−170
+357%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−323%
300−310
+323%
Counter-Strike 2 82
−327%
350−400
+327%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
−352%
140−150
+352%
Far Cry 5 45
−367%
210−220
+367%
Fortnite 90−95
−335%
400−450
+335%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−335%
300−310
+335%
Forza Horizon 5 65
−362%
300−310
+362%
Hogwarts Legacy 26
−362%
120−130
+362%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−376%
300−310
+376%
Valorant 130−140
−351%
600−650
+351%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−323%
300−310
+323%
Counter-Strike 2 39
−362%
180−190
+362%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−365%
1000−1050
+365%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−358%
110−120
+358%
Dota 2 100−110
−346%
450−500
+346%
Far Cry 5 41
−363%
190−200
+363%
Fortnite 90−95
−335%
400−450
+335%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−335%
300−310
+335%
Forza Horizon 5 60
−367%
280−290
+367%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−367%
210−220
+367%
Hogwarts Legacy 20
−375%
95−100
+375%
Metro Exodus 29
−348%
130−140
+348%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−376%
300−310
+376%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−378%
220−230
+378%
Valorant 130−140
−351%
600−650
+351%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−323%
300−310
+323%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−378%
110−120
+378%
Dota 2 100−110
−346%
450−500
+346%
Far Cry 5 39
−362%
180−190
+362%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−335%
300−310
+335%
Hogwarts Legacy 15
−367%
70−75
+367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−376%
300−310
+376%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−348%
130−140
+348%
Valorant 130−140
−351%
600−650
+351%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
−335%
400−450
+335%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27
−381%
130−140
+381%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−344%
550−600
+344%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
−372%
85−90
+372%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−363%
750−800
+363%
Valorant 160−170
−355%
750−800
+355%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−379%
230−240
+379%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
−369%
75−80
+369%
Far Cry 5 27
−381%
130−140
+381%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−363%
190−200
+363%
Hogwarts Legacy 15
−367%
70−75
+367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−375%
95−100
+375%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−374%
180−190
+374%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6
−350%
27−30
+350%
Grand Theft Auto V 21
−376%
100−105
+376%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−367%
70−75
+367%
Valorant 90−95
−379%
450−500
+379%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−350%
27−30
+350%
Dota 2 55−60
−375%
280−290
+375%
Far Cry 5 12
−358%
55−60
+358%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−348%
130−140
+348%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−369%
75−80
+369%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−371%
80−85
+371%

This is how Radeon 780M and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 357% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 355% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 362% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.68 75.51
Recency 31 January 2024 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 600 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 3900% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 381.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2190 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 38 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 780M or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.