RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Radeon 760M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 760M with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 760M
2023
15 Watt
14.09

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms 760M by a whopping 510% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3886
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.87
Power efficiency66.49no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameHawx PointGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2023 (1 year ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51224064
Core clock speed800 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate83.171,968
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs32752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Cores8188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared96 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 760M 14.09
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 85.96
+510%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 760M 5627
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 34320
+510%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30
−500%
180−190
+500%
1440p18
−456%
100−110
+456%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data47.58
1440pno data85.65

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30
−500%
180−190
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 105
−471%
600−650
+471%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−500%
180−190
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 24
−483%
140−150
+483%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−483%
350−400
+483%
Counter-Strike 2 77
−484%
450−500
+484%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−483%
140−150
+483%
Far Cry 5 38
−505%
230−240
+505%
Fortnite 75−80
−477%
450−500
+477%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−503%
350−400
+503%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−505%
260−270
+505%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−500%
300−310
+500%
Valorant 110−120
−503%
700−750
+503%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 19
−479%
110−120
+479%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−483%
350−400
+483%
Counter-Strike 2 33
−506%
200−210
+506%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−485%
1100−1150
+485%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−456%
100−105
+456%
Dota 2 85−90
−462%
500−550
+462%
Far Cry 5 35
−500%
210−220
+500%
Fortnite 75−80
−477%
450−500
+477%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−503%
350−400
+503%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−505%
260−270
+505%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
−500%
210−220
+500%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−500%
300−310
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−483%
210−220
+483%
Valorant 110−120
−503%
700−750
+503%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 18
−456%
100−105
+456%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−483%
350−400
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−486%
170−180
+486%
Dota 2 85−90
−462%
500−550
+462%
Far Cry 5 33
−506%
200−210
+506%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−503%
350−400
+503%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−500%
300−310
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−509%
140−150
+509%
Valorant 110−120
−503%
700−750
+503%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
−477%
450−500
+477%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16
−494%
95−100
+494%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−488%
600−650
+488%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−498%
700−750
+498%
Valorant 140−150
−490%
850−900
+490%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−505%
230−240
+505%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−500%
180−190
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−488%
200−210
+488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
−500%
180−190
+500%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−477%
150−160
+477%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Valorant 75−80
−500%
450−500
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Dota 2 45−50
−492%
290−300
+492%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%

This is how Radeon 760M and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 500% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 456% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.09 85.96
Recency 6 December 2023 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 600 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 3900% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 510.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 289 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 760M or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.