Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs Radeon 780M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298not rated
Place by popularity47not in top-100
Power efficiency84.85no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameHawx PointPonte Vecchio
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687168
Core clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2700 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate129.6694.4
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPS22.22 TFLOPS
ROPs32no data
TMUs48448
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Cores1256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,229 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2023 10 January 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 10 months, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 780M and Data Center GPU Max 1100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a notebook card while Data Center GPU Max 1100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
Data Center GPU Max 1100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1472 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.