Radeon RX 7600 XT vs 680M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 680M with Radeon RX 7600 XT, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 680M
2023
50 Watt
15.95

RX 7600 XT outperforms 680M by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking33981
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data77.94
Power efficiency21.8516.10
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed2000 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2755 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate105.6352.6
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48128
Ray Tracing Cores1232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 680M 15.95
RX 7600 XT 44.67
+180%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 680M 6146
RX 7600 XT 17209
+180%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
−170%
100−110
+170%
1440p17
−165%
45−50
+165%
4K11
−173%
30−35
+173%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.29
1440pno data7.31
4Kno data10.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
−156%
100−105
+156%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
−163%
100−105
+163%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−163%
150−160
+163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
−176%
80−85
+176%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−173%
300−310
+173%
Hitman 3 32
−166%
85−90
+166%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−179%
240−250
+179%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−167%
160−170
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−163%
150−160
+163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−171%
230−240
+171%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
−174%
85−90
+174%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−163%
150−160
+163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−162%
55−60
+162%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−173%
300−310
+173%
Hitman 3 30
−167%
80−85
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−179%
240−250
+179%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−167%
160−170
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
−177%
130−140
+177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−171%
230−240
+171%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
−178%
75−80
+178%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−165%
45−50
+165%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−173%
300−310
+173%
Hitman 3 27
−178%
75−80
+178%
Horizon Zero Dawn 43
−179%
120−130
+179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
−175%
110−120
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−171%
65−70
+171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
−178%
50−55
+178%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−173%
90−95
+173%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−178%
75−80
+178%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−173%
30−33
+173%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−177%
260−270
+177%
Hitman 3 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−166%
85−90
+166%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
−178%
75−80
+178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−165%
45−50
+165%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−176%
290−300
+176%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Hitman 3 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−170%
240−250
+170%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−169%
35−40
+169%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−171%
65−70
+171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
−150%
35−40
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

This is how Radeon 680M and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 XT is 170% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 XT is 165% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600 XT is 173% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.95 44.67
Recency 3 January 2023 8 January 2024
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 190 Watt

Radeon 680M has 280% lower power consumption.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has a 180.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 680M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 680M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 951 vote

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 609 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.