GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs Radeon 680M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 680M with GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 680M
2023
50 Watt
8.14

RTX 5070 Ti outperforms 680M by a whopping 882% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5317
Place by popularitynot in top-10063
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.22
Power efficiency11.7019.15
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRembrandt+GB203
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)20 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7688960
Core clock speed2000 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2452 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate105.6686.6
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS43.94 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs48280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Cores1270

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data896.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 680M 8.14
RTX 5070 Ti 79.94
+882%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 680M 3334
RTX 5070 Ti 32730
+882%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 680M 10399
RTX 5070 Ti 84984
+717%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 680M 34600
RTX 5070 Ti 142486
+312%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 680M 6865
RTX 5070 Ti 63928
+831%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 680M 43225
RTX 5070 Ti 291378
+574%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 680M 359776
RTX 5070 Ti 868314
+141%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
−505%
224
+505%
1440p17
−682%
133
+682%
4K11
−700%
88
+700%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.34
1440pno data5.63
4Kno data8.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−688%
300−350
+688%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
−434%
200−210
+434%
Hogwarts Legacy 34
−550%
221
+550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−447%
190−200
+447%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−688%
300−350
+688%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
−625%
200−210
+625%
Far Cry 5 38
−758%
326
+758%
Fortnite 45−50
−516%
300−350
+516%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−817%
300−350
+817%
Forza Horizon 5 52
−327%
220−230
+327%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
−800%
198
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%
Valorant 80−85
−512%
500−550
+512%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−447%
190−200
+447%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−688%
300−350
+688%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−119%
270−280
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−867%
200−210
+867%
Dota 2 71
−815%
650−700
+815%
Far Cry 5 35
−786%
310
+786%
Fortnite 45−50
−516%
300−350
+516%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−817%
300−350
+817%
Forza Horizon 5 46
−383%
220−230
+383%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−383%
170−180
+383%
Hogwarts Legacy 20
−790%
178
+790%
Metro Exodus 23
−948%
241
+948%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
−1223%
529
+1223%
Valorant 80−85
−512%
500−550
+512%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−447%
190−200
+447%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−1028%
200−210
+1028%
Dota 2 61
−802%
550−600
+802%
Far Cry 5 33
−791%
294
+791%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−817%
300−350
+817%
Hogwarts Legacy 14
−864%
135
+864%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−925%
246
+925%
Valorant 146
−244%
500−550
+244%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−516%
300−350
+516%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1729%
250−260
+1729%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−732%
500−550
+732%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−841%
160−170
+841%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−1600%
153
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−307%
170−180
+307%
Valorant 90−95
−427%
450−500
+427%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−989%
190−200
+989%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−1140%
120−130
+1140%
Far Cry 5 21
−1095%
251
+1095%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1453%
290−300
+1453%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−1033%
102
+1033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−1094%
203
+1094%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−788%
150−160
+788%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−874%
180−190
+874%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−2533%
79
+2533%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3267%
101
+3267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−1362%
190
+1362%
Valorant 40−45
−690%
300−350
+690%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−1411%
130−140
+1411%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−1425%
60−65
+1425%
Dota 2 18
−844%
170−180
+844%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1700%
144
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1962%
260−270
+1962%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−2000%
63
+2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1100%
95−100
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−888%
75−80
+888%

This is how Radeon 680M and RTX 5070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti is 505% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti is 682% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti is 700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5070 Ti is 11600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 5070 Ti surpassed Radeon 680M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.14 79.94
Recency 3 January 2023 20 February 2025
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

Radeon 680M has 500% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 882.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 680M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 680M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1050 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1381 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 680M or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.