Arc A370M vs Radeon 625

Place in performance ranking	761	317
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.45	no data
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 24	Alchemist
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	12 August 2019 (4 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$68	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	8
Core clock speed	no data	1550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1550 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	24.58	99.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon 625 and Arc A370M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.3	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 625 2.78

Arc A370M 15.79
+468%

Arc A370M outperforms Radeon 625 by 468% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon 625 1075

Arc A370M 5115
+376%

Arc A370M outperforms Radeon 625 by 376% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	6−7 −533%	38 +533%
1440p	3−4 −567%	20 +567%
4K	7−8 −471%	40 +471%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

0−1

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Battlefield 5	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	no data
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
Hitman 3	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Battlefield 5	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	no data
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
Hitman 3	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
Hitman 3	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	0−1	no data
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	no data
Metro Exodus	0−1	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data