Quadro P5200 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO 2000 Blackwell PRO 4000 Blackwell PRO 4500 Blackwell PRO 5000 Blackwell PRO 6000 PRO 6000 Blackwell PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell with Quadro P5200, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025
16 GB GDDR7, 70 Watt
34.28
+21.7%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell outperforms P5200 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking161222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency37.3121.45
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGB206GP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date11 August 2025 (recently)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43522560
Core clock speed790 MHz1556 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1746 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate265.2279.4
Floating-point processing power16.97 TFLOPS8.94 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs136160
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s230.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1bNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.41.2.131
CUDA12.06.1
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 34.28
+21.7%
Quadro P5200 28.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 14363
+21.7%
Quadro P5200 11800

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+16.7%
120
−16.7%
4K55−60
+14.6%
48
−14.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
God of War 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
God of War 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
God of War 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
God of War 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+0%
65
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
God of War 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
God of War 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and Quadro P5200 compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is 17% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is 15% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.28 28.16
Recency 11 August 2025 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 5 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 100 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 21.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
vs
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GTX 1070 SLI
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 4000 Blackwell SFF
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GTX 1070 SLI
vs
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 2000 Blackwell
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GTX 1070 SLI
vs
RX 7400 7400
RX 9060 AMD RX 9060
vs
GTX 1070 SLI 1070 SLI
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 4000 Blackwell SFF
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
vs
RX 7400 7400
RX 9060 AMD RX 9060
vs
Quadro P5200 P5200
RX Vega 64 Nano AMD RX Vega 64 Nano
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell NVIDIA PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
RX Vega 64 Nano Vega 64 Nano
RX Vega 64 Nano Vega 64 Nano
vs
RX 7400 7400

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 107 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or Quadro P5200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.