RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile with RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025
8 GB GDDR7, 45 Watt
35.08

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell outperforms RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile by a whopping 144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency60.4333.24
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGB206GB203
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores332810496
Core clock speed952 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speed1657 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate172.3789.5
Floating-point processing power11.03 TFLOPS50.53 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs104328
Tensor Cores104328
Ray Tracing Cores2682
L1 Cache3.3 MB10.3 MB
L2 Cache32 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA12.012.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130
−131%
300−350
+131%
1440p69
−132%
160−170
+132%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−125%
450−500
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−141%
200−210
+141%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
−144%
200−210
+144%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
−138%
300−310
+138%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−125%
450−500
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−141%
200−210
+141%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−143%
280−290
+143%
Fortnite 150−160
−123%
350−400
+123%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−116%
300−310
+116%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−139%
270−280
+139%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
−144%
200−210
+144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−110%
300−310
+110%
Valorant 210−220
−134%
500−550
+134%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
−138%
300−310
+138%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−125%
450−500
+125%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−134%
650−700
+134%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−141%
200−210
+141%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−143%
280−290
+143%
Fortnite 150−160
−123%
350−400
+123%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−116%
300−310
+116%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−139%
270−280
+139%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
−141%
350−400
+141%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
−144%
200−210
+144%
Metro Exodus 80−85
−138%
200−210
+138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−110%
300−310
+110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−144%
300−310
+144%
Valorant 210−220
−134%
500−550
+134%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
−138%
300−310
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−141%
200−210
+141%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−143%
280−290
+143%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−116%
300−310
+116%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
−144%
200−210
+144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−110%
300−310
+110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−144%
300−310
+144%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
−123%
350−400
+123%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−139%
210−220
+139%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−139%
600−650
+139%
Grand Theft Auto V 88
−139%
210−220
+139%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−131%
120−130
+131%
Valorant 240−250
−143%
600−650
+143%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
−137%
220−230
+137%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−144%
210−220
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−140%
240−250
+140%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
−137%
220−230
+137%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−137%
180−190
+137%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−134%
75−80
+134%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−132%
130−140
+132%
Valorant 210−220
−128%
500−550
+128%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
−128%
130−140
+128%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−139%
110−120
+139%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−139%
160−170
+139%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−139%
110−120
+139%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
−144%
110−120
+144%

This is how RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile and RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 131% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 132% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.08 85.76
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 200 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has 344.4% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 144.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 110 votes

Rate RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile or RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.