RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs RTX PRO 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5000 72 GB Blackwell 5000 Blackwell 6000 6000 Blackwell 6000 Blackwell Max-Q 6000 Blackwell Server 6000D Blackwell 6000D Blackwell Max-Q
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Embedded 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 6000 with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 6000
2025
96 GB GDDR7, 600 Watt
6.57

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms RTX PRO 6000 by a whopping 449% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX PRO 6000 RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking613152
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8461.59
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGB202GB206
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date2025 (1 year ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240643328
Core clock speed2017 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed2407 MHz1657 MHz
Number of transistors92,200 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate1,810172.3
Floating-point processing power115.8 TFLOPS11.03 TFLOPS
ROPs17632
TMUs752104
Tensor Cores752104
Ray Tracing Cores18826
L1 Cache23.5 MB3.3 MB
L2 Cache128 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length304 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount96 GB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.79 TB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1bPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA10.112.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−495%
125
+495%
1440p12−14
−483%
70
+483%
4K14−16
−479%
81
+479%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how RTX PRO 6000 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 495% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 483% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 479% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.57 36.07
Maximum RAM amount 96 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 45 Watt

RTX PRO 6000 has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has a 449% higher aggregate performance score, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX PRO 6000 RTX PRO 6000
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX PRO 6000 RTX PRO 6000
vs
FirePro R5000 FirePro R5000
RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090
vs
Apple M4 Max 32-Core GPU Max 32-Core GPU
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
vs
Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Playstation Vita GPU
vs
RTX 5090 Mobile RTX 5090 Mobile
RTX 5060 Mobile GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
vs
Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Apple M4 40-core GPU M4 40 core GPU
vs
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
vs
Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
RX 8060S Radeon RX 8060S
vs
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
vs
H100 SXM5 94 GB SXM5 94 GB
Radeon 820M Radeon 820M
vs
Apple M4 32-core GPU 32 core GPU
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
RX 9060 RX 9060

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 69 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 6000 or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.