RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A3000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A3000 Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A3000 Mobile
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
32.35

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX A3000 Mobile by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking16835
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency32.1227.46
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA104no data
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40967424
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1230 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate157.4no data
Floating-point processing power10.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data
Tensor Cores128no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth264.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A3000 Mobile 32.35
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.26
+83.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A3000 Mobile 12480
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 22862
+83.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD105
−81%
190−200
+81%
1440p51
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%
4K44
−81.8%
80−85
+81.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 77
−81.8%
140−150
+81.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−71.4%
120−130
+71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
−77.2%
140−150
+77.2%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−79.2%
190−200
+79.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
−81.8%
120−130
+81.8%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−78.1%
130−140
+78.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−80.7%
150−160
+80.7%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−73.4%
300−310
+73.4%
Hitman 3 65−70
−76.5%
120−130
+76.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−83.1%
260−270
+83.1%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−74.3%
190−200
+74.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−75%
140−150
+75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
−82.6%
210−220
+82.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−78%
210−220
+78%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−71.4%
120−130
+71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
−76.5%
120−130
+76.5%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−79.2%
190−200
+79.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 53
−79.2%
95−100
+79.2%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−78.1%
130−140
+78.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−80.7%
150−160
+80.7%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−73.4%
300−310
+73.4%
Hitman 3 65−70
−76.5%
120−130
+76.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−83.1%
260−270
+83.1%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−74.3%
190−200
+74.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−75%
140−150
+75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 134
−79.1%
240−250
+79.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−76.5%
120−130
+76.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−78%
210−220
+78%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−71.4%
120−130
+71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−78.1%
130−140
+78.1%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−73.4%
300−310
+73.4%
Hitman 3 65−70
−76.5%
120−130
+76.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 114
−75.4%
200−210
+75.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114
−75.4%
200−210
+75.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
−80.3%
110−120
+80.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 39
−79.5%
70−75
+79.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−75%
140−150
+75%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−77.4%
110−120
+77.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−80%
90−95
+80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−71.1%
65−70
+71.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−71.1%
65−70
+71.1%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−59.6%
300−310
+59.6%
Hitman 3 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−73.9%
120−130
+73.9%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−77.4%
110−120
+77.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 86
−74.4%
150−160
+74.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−81.8%
80−85
+81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
−75.4%
300−310
+75.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−78.6%
100−105
+78.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−81.3%
290−300
+81.3%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−75%
70−75
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
−77.8%
80−85
+77.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−77.8%
80−85
+77.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%

This is how RTX A3000 Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 81% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 76% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 82% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.35 59.26
Recency 12 April 2021 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 150 Watt

RTX A3000 Mobile has 114.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 83.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A3000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 125 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.