UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) vs RTX A2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 with UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), including specs and performance data.

RTX A2000
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
35.61
+1428%

RTX A2000 outperforms UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) by a whopping 1428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking127813
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.14no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Gen. 12 (2021)
GPU code nameGA106Alder Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 August 2021 (2 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data
Current price$567 (1.3x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores332824
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate124.8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX A2000 and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed12 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4ano data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3no data
CUDA8.6no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+1400%
8
−1400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+1400%
6−7
−1400%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+1400%
6−7
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+1344%
9−10
−1344%
Hitman 3 75−80
+1400%
5−6
−1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+1355%
11
−1355%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+1400%
5−6
−1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+1400%
10
−1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+1400%
14−16
−1400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+1400%
6−7
−1400%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+1400%
6−7
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+1344%
9−10
−1344%
Hitman 3 75−80
+1400%
5−6
−1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+1371%
16−18
−1371%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+1400%
3
−1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+1400%
5−6
−1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+1400%
10
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+1400%
8
−1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+1400%
14−16
−1400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+1400%
6−7
−1400%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+1344%
9−10
−1344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+1371%
16−18
−1371%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180−190
+1400%
12
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+1400%
4
−1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+1400%
14−16
−1400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+1400%
5−6
−1400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+1400%
5−6
−1400%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Hitman 3 100−105
+1329%
7−8
−1329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+1400%
6−7
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+1400%
5−6
−1400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+1400%
5−6
−1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%

This is how RTX A2000 and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 1400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.61 2.33
Recency 10 August 2021 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 10 nm

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A2000 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 521 vote

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 44 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.