Radeon 660M vs RTX A2000

Place in performance ranking	127	424
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	19.08	no data
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GA106	RDNA 2 Rembrandt
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	10 August 2021 (2 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	no data
Current price	$567 (1.3x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3328	384
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	12,000 million	13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	124.8	45.60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX A2000 and Radeon 660M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	167 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	192 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	12 GB/s	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2
CUDA	8.6	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 35.62
+264%

Radeon 660M 9.78

RTX A2000 outperforms Radeon 660M by 264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX A2000 13758
+119%

Radeon 660M 6285

RTX A2000 outperforms Radeon 660M by 119% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

90−95
+260%

−260%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+300%

6−7
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26 +271%	7−8 −271%
Battlefield 5	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 +300%	5−6 −300%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +286%	7−8 −286%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +300%	12−14 −300%
Hitman 3	21 +320%	5−6 −320%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45 +275%	12−14 −275%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +286%	7−8 −286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 +290%	10−11 −290%
Watch Dogs: Legion	26 +271%	7−8 −271%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 +280%	5−6 −280%
Battlefield 5	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +286%	7−8 −286%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +300%	12−14 −300%
Hitman 3	11 +267%	3−4 −267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +310%	10−11 −310%
Metro Exodus	15 +275%	4−5 −275%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +286%	7−8 −286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	32 +300%	8−9 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +317%	6−7 −317%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +300%	12−14 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	22 +267%	6−7 −267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	26 +271%	7−8 −271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 +275%	4−5 −275%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

+286%

7−8
−286%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Hitman 3	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+300%

4−5
−300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Hitman 3	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1