Radeon 610M vs RTX A2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 with Radeon 610M, including specs and performance data.

RTX A2000
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
34.54
+1129%

RTX A2000 outperforms 610M by a whopping 1129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking146797
Place by popularitynot in top-10073
Cost-effectiveness evaluation89.90no data
Power efficiency34.6613.16
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA106Dragon Range
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 August 2021 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3328128
Core clock speed562 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate124.817.60
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs1048
Tensor Cores104no data
Ray Tracing Cores262

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A2000 34.54
+1129%
Radeon 610M 2.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 13590
+1128%
Radeon 610M 1107

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A2000 19978
+598%
Radeon 610M 2863

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX A2000 76281
+532%
Radeon 610M 12065

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A2000 14934
+660%
Radeon 610M 1965

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A2000 94407
+579%
Radeon 610M 13898

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A2000 561627
+241%
Radeon 610M 164666

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
+638%
13
−638%
1440p43
−41.9%
61
+41.9%
4K27
+1250%
2−3
−1250%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.68no data
1440p10.44no data
4K16.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+1271%
7−8
−1271%
Counter-Strike 2 84
+833%
9−10
−833%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+1150%
6−7
−1150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+1271%
7−8
−1271%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+1222%
9−10
−1222%
Counter-Strike 2 62
+589%
9−10
−589%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+1150%
6−7
−1150%
Far Cry 5 108
+671%
14
−671%
Fortnite 140−150
+957%
14−16
−957%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+885%
12−14
−885%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+2300%
4−5
−2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+908%
12−14
−908%
Valorant 200−210
+349%
45−50
−349%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+1271%
7−8
−1271%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+1222%
9−10
−1222%
Counter-Strike 2 52
+478%
9−10
−478%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+433%
50−55
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+1150%
6−7
−1150%
Far Cry 5 98
+654%
13
−654%
Fortnite 140−150
+957%
14−16
−957%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+885%
12−14
−885%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+2300%
4−5
−2300%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+706%
16
−706%
Metro Exodus 60
+567%
9
−567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+908%
12−14
−908%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
+736%
14
−736%
Valorant 200−210
+349%
45−50
−349%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+1222%
9−10
−1222%
Counter-Strike 2 45
+400%
9−10
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+1150%
6−7
−1150%
Far Cry 5 91
+658%
12
−658%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+885%
12−14
−885%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+2300%
4−5
−2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+908%
12−14
−908%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+700%
8
−700%
Valorant 200−210
+349%
45−50
−349%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+957%
14−16
−957%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+1030%
20−22
−1030%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Metro Exodus 34 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+775%
20−22
−775%
Valorant 230−240
+290%
61
−290%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+1143%
7−8
−1143%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Far Cry 5 61
+1425%
4−5
−1425%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1400%
6−7
−1400%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+1075%
4−5
−1075%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+1580%
5−6
−1580%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+273%
14−16
−273%
Metro Exodus 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Valorant 190−200
+1321%
14−16
−1321%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 30
+900%
3−4
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+2900%
2−3
−2900%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how RTX A2000 and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 638% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 610M is 42% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 is 1250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A2000 is 5700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is ahead in 55 tests (93%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.54 2.81
Recency 10 August 2021 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 15 Watt

RTX A2000 has a 1129.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 610M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A2000 is a workstation card while Radeon 610M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 597 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 847 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A2000 or Radeon 610M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.