RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Place in the ranking	17	92
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.78	no data
Power efficiency	16.64	25.51
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	AD102	no data
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	3 December 2022 (1 year ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$6,799	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	18176	4608
Core clock speed	915 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2505 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	76,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	1,423	no data
Floating-point processing power	91.06 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	192	no data
TMUs	568	no data
Tensor Cores	568	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	142	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	960.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	6.8	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 72.10
+70.2%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 42.36

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 27821
+70.2%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 16345

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+146%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 28847

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+78.3%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20571

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	183 +83%	100−110 −83%
1440p	158 +75.6%	90−95 −75.6%
4K	113 +73.8%	65−70 −73.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	37.15	no data
1440p	43.03	no data
4K	60.17	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +76.5%	85−90 −76.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +76%	75−80 −76%
Battlefield 5	230−240 +80.8%	130−140 −80.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +71.4%	70−75 −71.4%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +80%	65−70 −80%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 +80%	100−105 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +72.9%	140−150 −72.9%
Hitman 3	120−130 +72%	75−80 −72%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 +76%	150−160 −76%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +72.2%	90−95 −72.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +75.7%	70−75 −75.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−350 +73.3%	180−190 −73.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +80%	85−90 −80%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +76.5%	85−90 −76.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +76%	75−80 −76%
Battlefield 5	230−240 +80.8%	130−140 −80.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +71.4%	70−75 −71.4%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +80%	65−70 −80%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 +80%	100−105 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +72.9%	140−150 −72.9%
Hitman 3	120−130 +72%	75−80 −72%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 +76%	150−160 −76%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +72.2%	90−95 −72.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +75.7%	70−75 −75.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−350 +73.3%	180−190 −73.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +76.7%	90−95 −76.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +80%	85−90 −80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +76.5%	85−90 −76.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +76%	75−80 −76%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +71.4%	70−75 −71.4%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +80%	65−70 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +72.9%	140−150 −72.9%
Hitman 3	120−130 +72%	75−80 −72%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 +76%	150−160 −76%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−350 +73.3%	180−190 −73.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	260 +73.3%	150−160 −73.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +80%	85−90 −80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+75.7%

70−75
−75.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +74.7%	95−100 −74.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +72.3%	65−70 −72.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +74%	50−55 −74%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +70.9%	55−60 −70.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +82.2%	45−50 −82.2%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +86.7%	45−50 −86.7%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +80.7%	150−160 −80.7%
Hitman 3	100−110 +78.3%	60−65 −78.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +71.8%	110−120 −71.8%
Metro Exodus	99 +80%	55−60 −80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 +76.7%	120−130 −76.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	219 +82.5%	120−130 −82.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 +71.4%	140−150 −71.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

+81.5%

65−70
−81.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +76%	50−55 −76%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +72.5%	40−45 −72.5%
Hitman 3	65−70 +85.7%	35−40 −85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	87 +74%	50−55 −74%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +83.1%	65−70 −83.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	184 +84%	100−105 −84%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +74.3%	35−40 −74.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +96.7%	30−33 −96.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +73.3%	30−33 −73.3%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +85.2%	27−30 −85.2%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +76%	75−80 −76%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +81.5%	65−70 −81.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +77.8%	27−30 −77.8%