RTX PRO 6000 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 6000 Ada Generation and RTX PRO 6000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022
48 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
71.59

RTX PRO 6000 outperforms RTX 6000 Ada Generation by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2215
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.89no data
Power efficiency16.949.09
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameAD102GB202
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 December 2022 (2 years ago)2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1817624064
Core clock speed915 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed2505 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate1,4231,810
Floating-point processing power91.06 TFLOPS115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs192176
TMUs568752
Tensor Cores568752
Ray Tracing Cores142188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount48 GB96 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth960.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.910.1
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 71.59
RTX PRO 6000 76.85
+7.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28483
RTX PRO 6000 30576
+7.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD183
−3.8%
190−200
+3.8%
1440p160
−6.3%
170−180
+6.3%
4K109
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p37.15no data
1440p42.49no data
4K62.38no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+6.3%
300−310
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
−4%
180−190
+4%
Dead Island 2 290−300
−2%
300−310
+2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
−5.6%
190−200
+5.6%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+6.3%
300−310
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
−4%
180−190
+4%
Dead Island 2 290−300
−2%
300−310
+2%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310
−0.7%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
−5.8%
290−300
+5.8%
Forza Horizon 5 200−210
−4.5%
210−220
+4.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−2.3%
180−190
+2.3%
Valorant 350−400
−1%
400−450
+1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
−5.6%
190−200
+5.6%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+6.3%
300−310
−6.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−4.3%
290−300
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
−4%
180−190
+4%
Dead Island 2 290−300
−2%
300−310
+2%
Far Cry 5 126
−3.2%
130−140
+3.2%
Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310
−0.7%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
−5.8%
290−300
+5.8%
Forza Horizon 5 200−210
−4.5%
210−220
+4.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
−5.9%
180−190
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 114
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−2.3%
180−190
+2.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 489
−2.2%
500−550
+2.2%
Valorant 350−400
−1%
400−450
+1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
−5.6%
190−200
+5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
−4%
180−190
+4%
Dead Island 2 290−300
−2%
300−310
+2%
Far Cry 5 118
−1.7%
120−130
+1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
−5.8%
290−300
+5.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−2.3%
180−190
+2.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 260
−3.8%
270−280
+3.8%
Valorant 350−400
−1%
400−450
+1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310
−0.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
−3.8%
220−230
+3.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
−6.6%
550−600
+6.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
−4.2%
150−160
+4.2%
Metro Exodus 95
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−2.9%
180−190
+2.9%
Valorant 450−500
−3.1%
500−550
+3.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 170−180
−7.3%
190−200
+7.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Dead Island 2 180−190
−5.6%
190−200
+5.6%
Far Cry 5 118
−1.7%
120−130
+1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−4.6%
250−260
+4.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 219
−5%
230−240
+5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
−6%
160−170
+6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dead Island 2 80−85
−3.7%
85−90
+3.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
−1.8%
170−180
+1.8%
Metro Exodus 90
−5.6%
95−100
+5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
−3.3%
190−200
+3.3%
Valorant 300−350
−5.7%
350−400
+5.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−6.9%
140−150
+6.9%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
−4.2%
100−105
+4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Dead Island 2 80−85
−3.7%
85−90
+3.7%
Far Cry 5 115
−4.3%
120−130
+4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−3.1%
200−210
+3.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−4.2%
100−105
+4.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%

This is how RTX 6000 Ada Generation and RTX PRO 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 is 6% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 is 1% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 71.59 76.85
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 96 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 600 Watt

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 7.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between RTX 6000 Ada Generation and RTX PRO 6000.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 114 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 38 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 6000 Ada Generation or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.