RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2000 Ada Generation 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 4000 Ada Generation 4000 SFF Ada Generation 4500 Ada Generation 5000 Ada Generation 5880 Ada Generation 6000 Ada Generation
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4000 Ada Generation with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023
20 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
54.31
+35.5%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 4000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking50101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.8034.13
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameAD104GB203
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date9 August 2023 (2 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores614410496
Core clock speed1500 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speed2175 MHz1515 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate417.6496.9
Floating-point processing power26.73 TFLOPS31.8 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs192328
Tensor Cores192328
Ray Tracing Cores4882
L1 Cache6 MB10.3 MB
L2 Cache48 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length245 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount20 GB24 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.912.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
+30.4%
115
−30.4%
1440p100−110
+23.5%
81
−23.5%
4K60−65
+27.7%
47
−27.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−310
+0%
300−310
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how RTX 4000 Ada Generation and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 30% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 23% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 28% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 54.31 40.07
Recency 9 August 2023 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 24 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 35.5% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 Ada Generation
vs
PRO W7700 Radeon PRO W7700
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 Ada Generation
vs
RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5090 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 5090 Mobile
vs
Jetson TX2 TX2
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
Tesla M6 Mobile M6 Mobile
RTX 4070 SUPER NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER
vs
Arc Pro A60M A60M
GTS 450 NVIDIA GTS 450
vs
RX 7600 7600
RX 7600 7600
vs
RTX 4060 Max-Q 4060 Max-Q
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
vs
Arc A530M A530M
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Arc Graphics 64EU Intel Graphics 64EU
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Cores iGPU (Arc)
Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU AMD AI Z2 Extreme GPU
vs
RTX 5080 5080
HD Graphics 520 Intel Graphics 520
vs
Arc Graphics 130V 130V

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 64 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 4000 Ada Generation or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.