GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
53.31
+115%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47239
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.80
Power efficiency35.7324.96
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAD103TU116
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)23 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97281536
Core clock speed1425 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate643.0152.6
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs11248
TMUs30496
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MB1.5 MB
L2 Cache64 MB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA8.97.5
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 53.31
+115%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 24.83

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 51771
+157%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 20119

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 30422
+105%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 14818

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 14861
+163%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 5659

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD180−190
+105%
88
−105%
1440p120−130
+107%
58
−107%
4K75−80
+114%
35
−114%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.60
1440pno data3.95
4Kno data6.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 147
+0%
147
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 74
+0%
74
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 133
+0%
133
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+0%
134
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 209
+0%
209
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+0%
125
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 48
+0%
48
+0%
Metro Exodus 54
+0%
54
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 207
+0%
207
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Dota 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+0%
109
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%
Valorant 125
+0%
125
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107
+0%
107
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 30
+0%
30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 197
+0%
197
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+0%
69
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 152
+0%
152
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 105% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 107% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 114% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.31 24.83
Recency 21 March 2023 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 114.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 63 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1699 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.