GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 2000 Ada Generation with GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024
16 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
42.49

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9458
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.62no data
Power efficiency43.4963.74
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameAD107GB205
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2024 (1 year ago)2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28165888
Core clock speed1620 MHz847 MHz
Boost clock speed2130 MHz1447 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate187.4266.2
Floating-point processing power12 TFLOPS17.04 TFLOPS
ROPs4880
TMUs88184
Tensor Cores88184
Ray Tracing Cores2246

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.912.0
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 42.49
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 53.03
+24.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17396
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 21711
+24.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.49 53.03
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 24.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 2000 Ada Generation in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 40 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 89 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 2000 Ada Generation or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.