RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	216	63
Place by popularity	45	not in top-100
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Ampere GA106	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2816
Core clock speed	1552 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1777 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	102.0	187.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 Mobile 23.62

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.35
+96.2%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3050 Mobile 9122

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17901
+96.2%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 96% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	93 −93.5%	180−190 +93.5%
1440p	53 −88.7%	100−110 +88.7%
4K	31 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

106

−88.7%

200−210
+88.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75 −86.7%	140−150 +86.7%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −94.8%	150−160 +94.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	83 −92.8%	160−170 +92.8%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −81.8%	100−105 +81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −93.5%	120−130 +93.5%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −92.3%	200−210 +92.3%
Hitman 3	45−50 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	207 −93.2%	400−450 +93.2%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −94.8%	150−160 +94.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −90.5%	120−130 +90.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	156 −92.3%	300−310 +92.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85 −88.2%	160−170 +88.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	62 −93.5%	120−130 +93.5%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −94.8%	150−160 +94.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 −80.3%	110−120 +80.3%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −81.8%	100−105 +81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −93.5%	120−130 +93.5%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −92.3%	200−210 +92.3%
Hitman 3	35 −85.7%	65−70 +85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −93.5%	180−190 +93.5%
Metro Exodus	51 −96.1%	100−105 +96.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −90.5%	120−130 +90.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	123 −95.1%	240−250 +95.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	168 −78.6%	300−310 +78.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −91.2%	130−140 +91.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	53 −88.7%	100−105 +88.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 −80.3%	110−120 +80.3%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −81.8%	100−105 +81.8%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −92.3%	200−210 +92.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	107 −86.9%	200−210 +86.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	106 −88.7%	200−210 +88.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65 −84.6%	120−130 +84.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	71 −83.1%	130−140 +83.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
−90.5%

120−130

+90.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −93.9%	95−100 +93.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −80%	45−50 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40 −87.5%	75−80 +87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 −83.3%	55−60 +83.3%
Far Cry 5	68 −91.2%	130−140 +91.2%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%
Hitman 3	27−30 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	78 −92.3%	150−160 +92.3%
Metro Exodus	69 −88.4%	130−140 +88.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	78 −92.3%	150−160 +92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −89.7%	55−60 +89.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	33 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−92.3%

75−80
+92.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Hitman 3	34 −91.2%	65−70 +91.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30 −83.3%	55−60 +83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 −93.2%	85−90 +93.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 −75%	21−24 +75%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	44 −93.2%	85−90 +93.2%
Metro Exodus	37 −89.2%	70−75 +89.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−90.5%

40−45
+90.5%

This is how RTX 3050 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 94% faster in 1080p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 89% faster in 1440p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 94% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	23.62	46.35
Recency	4 January 2022	12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	70 Watt