RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4060 Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
39.34
+1%

RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7780
Place by popularity51not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data97.86
Power efficiency27.2244.29
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD107AD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722816
Core clock speed1545 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1890 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate181.4187.4
Floating-point processing power11.61 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs9688
Tensor Cores9688
Ray Tracing Cores2422

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.9
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4060 Mobile 39.34
+1%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 38.96

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4060 Mobile 17593
+1%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17419

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD113
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
1440p63
+5%
60−65
−5%
4K39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.90
1440pno data10.82
4Kno data18.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 151
+7.9%
140−150
−7.9%
Counter-Strike 2 195
+2.6%
190−200
−2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 123
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 122
+1.7%
120−130
−1.7%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+6.9%
130−140
−6.9%
Counter-Strike 2 195
+2.6%
190−200
−2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+4.2%
95−100
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 128
+6.7%
120−130
−6.7%
Fortnite 180−190
+6.5%
170−180
−6.5%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
Forza Horizon 5 137
+5.4%
130−140
−5.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
Valorant 240−250
+4.3%
230−240
−4.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 82
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+6.9%
130−140
−6.9%
Counter-Strike 2 146
+4.3%
140−150
−4.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+3%
270−280
−3%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+5%
80−85
−5%
Dota 2 164
+2.5%
160−170
−2.5%
Far Cry 5 129
+7.5%
120−130
−7.5%
Fortnite 180−190
+6.5%
170−180
−6.5%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
Forza Horizon 5 125
+4.2%
120−130
−4.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+8.5%
130−140
−8.5%
Metro Exodus 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 191
+6.1%
180−190
−6.1%
Valorant 240−250
+4.3%
230−240
−4.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+6.9%
130−140
−6.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+2.7%
75−80
−2.7%
Dota 2 156
+4%
150−160
−4%
Far Cry 5 125
+4.2%
120−130
−4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
+1%
100−105
−1%
Valorant 240−250
+4.3%
230−240
−4.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+6.5%
170−180
−6.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 98
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+1%
290−300
−1%
Grand Theft Auto V 85
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 270−280
+3.8%
260−270
−3.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+6%
100−105
−6%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Far Cry 5 98
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+3.3%
120−130
−3.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+3.6%
110−120
−3.6%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Metro Exodus 37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+10%
50−55
−10%
Valorant 250−260
+2.4%
250−260
−2.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Dota 2 126
+5%
120−130
−5%
Far Cry 5 40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%

This is how RTX 4060 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 3% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.34 38.96
Recency 3 January 2023 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4060 Mobile has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 64.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3628 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 39 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.