RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	115	63
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	GN20-E5 GA104	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 January 2021 (3 years ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	2816
Core clock speed	780 - 1100 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1290 - 1620 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	287.0	187.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	320.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.5	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Mobile 37.20

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.35
+24.6%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3070 Mobile 14364

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17901
+24.6%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 25% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	114 −22.8%	140−150 +22.8%
1440p	75 −20%	90−95 +20%
4K	48 −14.6%	55−60 +14.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

119

−17.6%

140−150
+17.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 −21.2%	80−85 +21.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	91 −20.9%	110−120 +20.9%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −16.7%	140−150 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	107 −21.5%	130−140 +21.5%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −23.5%	100−105 +23.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 −18.3%	110−120 +18.3%
Forza Horizon 4	189 −21.7%	230−240 +21.7%
Hitman 3	114 −22.8%	140−150 +22.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	199 −20.6%	240−250 +20.6%
Metro Exodus	100−110 −19.3%	130−140 +19.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 −20.9%	110−120 +20.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	224 −20.5%	270−280 +20.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	89 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 −21.2%	80−85 +21.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	76 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −16.7%	140−150 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	88 −13.6%	100−105 +13.6%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −23.5%	100−105 +23.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 −18.3%	110−120 +18.3%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −18.1%	170−180 +18.1%
Hitman 3	92 −19.6%	110−120 +19.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −20%	180−190 +20%
Metro Exodus	125 −20%	150−160 +20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85 −17.6%	100−105 +17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	183 −20.2%	220−230 +20.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170 −23.5%	210−220 +23.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	181 −21.5%	220−230 +21.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 −21.2%	80−85 +21.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	68 −17.6%	80−85 +17.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	74 −21.6%	90−95 +21.6%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −23.5%	100−105 +23.5%
Forza Horizon 4	167 −19.8%	200−210 +19.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	132 −21.2%	160−170 +21.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	168 −19%	200−210 +19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	94 −17%	110−120 +17%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60 −16.7%	70−75 +16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

82
−22%

100−105

+22%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −19.7%	85−90 +19.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	123 −22%	150−160 +22%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −12.5%	45−50 +12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	53 −22.6%	65−70 +22.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	56 −16.1%	65−70 +16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	47 −17%	55−60 +17%
Far Cry 5	91 −20.9%	110−120 +20.9%
Forza Horizon 4	140 −21.4%	170−180 +21.4%
Hitman 3	68 −17.6%	80−85 +17.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	112 −16.1%	130−140 +16.1%
Metro Exodus	91 −20.9%	110−120 +20.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	125 −20%	150−160 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −22.6%	65−70 +22.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55 −18.2%	65−70 +18.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−23.3%

90−95
+23.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −21.6%	45−50 +21.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −12.9%	35−40 +12.9%
Hitman 3	38 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −17%	55−60 +17%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	48 −14.6%	55−60 +14.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	64 −17.2%	75−80 +17.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −20%	30−33 +20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	33 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Forza Horizon 4	93 −18.3%	110−120 +18.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	63 −19%	75−80 +19%
Metro Exodus	58 −20.7%	70−75 +20.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−13.6%

50−55
+13.6%

This is how RTX 3070 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 23% faster in 1080p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 20% faster in 1440p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 15% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	37.20	46.35
Recency	4 January 2021	12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	70 Watt