Iris Plus Graphics vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
40 Watt
10.37
+130%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS outperforms Iris Plus Graphics by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking429654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.7021.63
Architectureno dataGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameno dataIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536512
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data32.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.024 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
+144%
16−18
−144%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23
+156%
9−10
−156%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 22
+144%
9−10
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+133%
24−27
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Valorant 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+138%
8−9
−138%
Dota 2 36
+157%
14−16
−157%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Fortnite 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 48
+167%
18−20
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
+157%
14−16
−157%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+137%
35−40
−137%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Valorant 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
World of Tanks 150−160
+137%
65−70
−137%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+156%
16−18
−156%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+137%
35−40
−137%
Valorant 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
World of Tanks 75−80
+160%
30−33
−160%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Valorant 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Fortnite 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Valorant 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 144% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.37 4.50
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has a 130.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 14 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 379 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.