Radeon Graphics vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
VS
Graphics Graphics 128SP Graphics 384SP Graphics 448SP Graphics 512SP

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023
30 Watt
11.03
+509%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms Graphics by a whopping 509% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Graphics Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking432927
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Power efficiency27.449.00
Architectureno dataGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataRenoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2023 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536448
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.344 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD32
+540%
5−6
−540%
1440p14
+600%
2−3
−600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+520%
10−11
−520%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+520%
10−11
−520%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 30
+650%
4−5
−650%
Fortnite 65−70
+570%
10−11
−570%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
Valorant 100−110
+538%
16−18
−538%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+520%
10−11
−520%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+583%
24−27
−583%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 28
+600%
4−5
−600%
Fortnite 65−70
+570%
10−11
−570%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+600%
5−6
−600%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+567%
6−7
−567%
Valorant 100−110
+538%
16−18
−538%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 26
+550%
4−5
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Valorant 100−110
+538%
16−18
−538%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+570%
10−11
−570%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+608%
12−14
−608%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+650%
2−3
−650%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+590%
10−11
−590%
Valorant 120−130
+583%
18−20
−583%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Valorant 60−65
+567%
9−10
−567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 540% faster in 1080p
  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 600% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 11.03 1.81
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 509.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
Graphics Radeon Graphics
vs
R5 A240 Radeon R5 A240
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
RTX A400 RTX A400
vs
Apple M4 8-core GPU 8 core GPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
HD Graphics 4200 HD Graphics 4200
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
K2000D Quadro K2000D
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
vs
UHD Graphics 48EU UHD Graphics 48EU
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
UHD Graphics 48EU UHD Graphics 48EU
Arc B580 Arc B580
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 830 Adreno 830
Apple M4 40-core GPU M4 40 core GPU
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
vs
Pro 5600M Pro 5600M
R9 M265X Radeon R9 M265X
vs
9800M GTX SLI GeForce 9800M GTX SLI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 7183 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or Radeon Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.