Iris Plus Graphics vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
2024
20 Watt
5.72
+41.2%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS outperforms Plus Graphics by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking622704
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.0321.74
Architectureno dataGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameno dataIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2024 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768512
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data32.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.024 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Far Cry 5 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Fortnite 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Valorant 70−75
+55.6%
45−50
−55.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+44.3%
70−75
−44.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Far Cry 5 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Fortnite 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Valorant 70−75
+55.6%
45−50
−55.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Far Cry 5 18
+50%
12−14
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Valorant 70−75
+55.6%
45−50
−55.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Valorant 65−70
+51.1%
45−50
−51.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Valorant 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is 43% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.72 4.05
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has a 41.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 467 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.