GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023
40 Watt
10.12

RTX 5070 Mobile outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS by a whopping 322% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking45990
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.1861.45
Architectureno dataBlackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB206
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2023 (1 year ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15364608
Core clock speedno data907 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1425 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data205.2
Floating-point processing powerno data13.13 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−300%
140−150
+300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−307%
220−230
+307%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−309%
180−190
+309%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−307%
220−230
+307%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Far Cry 5 31
−319%
130−140
+319%
Fortnite 60−65
−317%
250−260
+317%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−309%
180−190
+309%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−317%
150−160
+317%
Valorant 95−100
−321%
400−450
+321%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−309%
180−190
+309%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−307%
220−230
+307%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−297%
600−650
+297%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Far Cry 5 30
−300%
120−130
+300%
Fortnite 60−65
−317%
250−260
+317%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−309%
180−190
+309%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−317%
150−160
+317%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−317%
150−160
+317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
−315%
170−180
+315%
Valorant 95−100
−321%
400−450
+321%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−309%
180−190
+309%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Far Cry 5 27
−307%
110−120
+307%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−309%
180−190
+309%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−317%
150−160
+317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−309%
90−95
+309%
Valorant 95−100
−321%
400−450
+321%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
−317%
250−260
+317%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−290%
300−310
+290%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−315%
220−230
+315%
Valorant 110−120
−302%
450−500
+302%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−317%
100−105
+317%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Valorant 50−55
−315%
220−230
+315%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and RTX 5070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 300% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.12 42.75
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 50 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 322.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 16 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 24 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS or GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.