RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023
30 Watt
11.63

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS by a whopping 639% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4416
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.86
Power efficiency27.4410.15
Architectureno dataBlackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2023 (1 year ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153624064
Core clock speedno data1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,968
Floating-point processing powerno data126 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data96 GB
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD32
−619%
230−240
+619%
1440p14
−614%
100−110
+614%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data37.24
1440pno data85.65

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 24
−608%
170−180
+608%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−626%
450−500
+626%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 20
−600%
140−150
+600%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−600%
350−400
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−626%
450−500
+626%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Far Cry 5 30
−633%
220−230
+633%
Fortnite 65−70
−572%
450−500
+572%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−629%
350−400
+629%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−614%
250−260
+614%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−632%
300−310
+632%
Valorant 100−110
−635%
750−800
+635%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 17
−606%
120−130
+606%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−600%
350−400
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−626%
450−500
+626%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−632%
1200−1250
+632%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Far Cry 5 28
−614%
200−210
+614%
Fortnite 65−70
−572%
450−500
+572%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−629%
350−400
+629%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−614%
250−260
+614%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
−614%
250−260
+614%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−632%
300−310
+632%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
−625%
290−300
+625%
Valorant 100−110
−635%
750−800
+635%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 17
−606%
120−130
+606%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−600%
350−400
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Far Cry 5 26
−631%
190−200
+631%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−629%
350−400
+629%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−632%
300−310
+632%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−637%
140−150
+637%
Valorant 100−110
−635%
750−800
+635%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−572%
450−500
+572%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−606%
600−650
+606%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−633%
110−120
+633%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−614%
450−500
+614%
Valorant 120−130
−632%
900−950
+632%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 11
−627%
80−85
+627%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−633%
220−230
+633%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−608%
170−180
+608%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−604%
190−200
+604%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−608%
170−180
+608%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−627%
160−170
+627%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Valorant 60−65
−567%
400−450
+567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 619% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 614% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.63 85.99
Recency 26 October 2023 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 600 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 639.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.