UHD Graphics vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
2024
20 Watt
6.19
+21.4%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS outperforms UHD Graphics by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking589632
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Power efficiency23.1038.06
Architectureno dataGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameno dataJasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2024 (less than a year ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768256
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
+25%
16−18
−25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Fortnite 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Valorant 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+22.4%
85−90
−22.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Fortnite 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Valorant 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Valorant 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Valorant 70−75
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is 25% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.19 5.10
Recency 3 September 2024 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 10 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has a 21.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7691 vote

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.