UHD Graphics vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
VS
24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 64EU 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 600 605 610 617 620 730 (Rocket Lake) Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023
30 Watt
11.35
+116%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms UHD Graphics by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking437637
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Power efficiency27.2237.73
Architectureno dataGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameno dataJasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2023 (1 year ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536256
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz750 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD32
+129%
14−16
−129%
1440p14
+133%
6−7
−133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+130%
27−30
−130%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+130%
27−30
−130%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Far Cry 5 30
+150%
12−14
−150%
Fortnite 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Valorant 100−110
+127%
45−50
−127%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+130%
27−30
−130%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+119%
75−80
−119%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Far Cry 5 28
+133%
12−14
−133%
Fortnite 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+119%
16−18
−119%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+122%
18−20
−122%
Valorant 100−110
+127%
45−50
−127%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Far Cry 5 26
+117%
12−14
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+138%
8−9
−138%
Valorant 100−110
+127%
45−50
−127%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+150%
6−7
−150%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Valorant 120−130
+125%
55−60
−125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Valorant 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 129% faster in 1080p
  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 133% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 11.35 5.25
Recency 26 October 2023 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 10 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 116.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
Radeon 880M AMD Radeon 880M
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
9800M GT GeForce 9800M GT
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
GT 730 GT 730
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
GTX 560 GTX 560
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
R7 M365X AMD Radeon R7 M365X
vs
GeForce 825M GeForce 825M
R7 A265 AMD Radeon R7 A265
vs
GeForce 930M GeForce 930M
Tesla K20c NVIDIA Tesla K20c
vs
FirePro S7150 FirePro S7150
GTX 1070 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
vs
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7810 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.