UHD Graphics vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
30 Watt
10.64
+90%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms UHD Graphics by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking435609
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Power efficiency24.4638.62
Architectureno dataGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameno dataJasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateno data11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536256
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz750 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
1440p17
+113%
8−9
−113%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+90%
10−11
−90%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+108%
24−27
−108%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Valorant 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+100%
8−9
−100%
Dota 2 35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Fortnite 60−65
+107%
30−33
−107%
Forza Horizon 4 42
+100%
21−24
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+103%
40−45
−103%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Valorant 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
World of Tanks 150−160
+101%
75−80
−101%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+100%
7−8
−100%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Forza Horizon 4 36
+100%
18−20
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+103%
40−45
−103%
Valorant 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 15
+114%
7−8
−114%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+114%
7−8
−114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
World of Tanks 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Counter-Strike 2 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Forza Horizon 4 28
+100%
14−16
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Valorant 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Fortnite 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Valorant 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 94% faster in 1080p
  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 113% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.64 5.60
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 10 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 90% higher aggregate performance score, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6819 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.