RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
2024
20 Watt
5.72

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS by a whopping 1087% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking62120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.0478.13
Architectureno dataBlackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2024 (1 year ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7688960
Core clock speedno data790 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1337 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data374.4
Floating-point processing powerno data23.96 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cacheno data8.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−1050%
230−240
+1050%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Far Cry 5 21
−1043%
240−250
+1043%
Fortnite 35−40
−981%
400−450
+981%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−971%
300−310
+971%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−1067%
210−220
+1067%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1074%
270−280
+1074%
Valorant 70−75
−1043%
800−850
+1043%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−1039%
1150−1200
+1039%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Far Cry 5 19
−1058%
220−230
+1058%
Fortnite 35−40
−981%
400−450
+981%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−971%
300−310
+971%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−1067%
210−220
+1067%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
−1067%
280−290
+1067%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1074%
270−280
+1074%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−1082%
260−270
+1082%
Valorant 70−75
−1043%
800−850
+1043%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Far Cry 5 18
−1067%
210−220
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−971%
300−310
+971%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1074%
270−280
+1074%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Valorant 70−75
−1043%
800−850
+1043%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−981%
400−450
+981%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−1070%
550−600
+1070%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−1084%
450−500
+1084%
Valorant 65−70
−1076%
800−850
+1076%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−1067%
210−220
+1067%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Valorant 30−35
−1029%
350−400
+1029%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 1050% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.72 67.89
Recency 3 September 2024 11 August 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 70 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has a 1086.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.