Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking162not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency37.31no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)no data
GPU code nameGB206no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 August 2025 (recently)3 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4352768
Core clock speed790 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1950 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate265.2no data
Floating-point processing power16.97 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs136no data
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8no data
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1bno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.4-
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 August 2025 3 September 2024
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 20 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has an age advantage of 11 months.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 44 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.