P102-100 vs Quadro4 900 XGL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro4 900 XGL and P102-100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro4 900 XGL
2002
128 MB DDR
0.01

P102-100 outperforms Quadro4 900 XGL by a whopping 65800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1522540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.25
Power efficiencyno data2.10
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNV25 A2GP102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date19 February 2002 (23 years ago)12 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3200
Core clock speed300 MHz1582 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1683 MHz
Number of transistors63 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400336.6
Floating-point processing powerno data10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs8200

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount128 MB5 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed325 MHz1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/s440.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro4 900 XGL 0.01
P102-100 6.59
+65800%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro4 900 XGL 4
P102-100 2945
+73525%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 6.59
Recency 19 February 2002 12 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 5 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm

P102-100 has a 65800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

The P102-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro4 900 XGL in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
Quadro4 900 XGL
NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro4 900 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 34 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 900 XGL or P102-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.