Radeon RX 6600S vs Quadro T500 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro T500 Mobile with Radeon RX 6600S, including specs and performance data.
RX 6600S outperforms T500 Mobile by a whopping 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 488 | 174 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 34.47 | 27.86 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | TU117 | Navi 23 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 December 2020 (4 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 896 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,700 million | 11,060 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 | 224.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.037 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| TMUs | 56 | 112 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 28 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 36
−233%
| 120−130
+233%
|
| 1440p | 15
−233%
| 50−55
+233%
|
| 4K | 17
−253%
| 60−65
+253%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
−278%
|
65−70
+278%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−221%
|
90−95
+221%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8
−750%
|
65−70
+750%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30
−233%
|
100−105
+233%
|
| Fortnite | 50−55
−258%
|
190−200
+258%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−317%
|
150−160
+317%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21−24
−282%
|
80−85
+282%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
−252%
|
250−260
+252%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
−175%
|
65−70
+175%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−279%
|
120−130
+279%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−221%
|
90−95
+221%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6
−1033%
|
65−70
+1033%
|
| Dota 2 | 90
−17.8%
|
100−110
+17.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 28
−214%
|
85−90
+214%
|
| Fortnite | 50−55
−183%
|
150−160
+183%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−317%
|
150−160
+317%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21−24
−282%
|
80−85
+282%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 31
−242%
|
100−110
+242%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
−238%
|
80−85
+238%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
−158%
|
180−190
+158%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
−175%
|
65−70
+175%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 28
−293%
|
110−120
+293%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−279%
|
120−130
+279%
|
| World of Tanks | 130−140
−108%
|
270−280
+108%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−221%
|
90−95
+221%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5
−1260%
|
65−70
+1260%
|
| Dota 2 | 75
−41.3%
|
100−110
+41.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27
−226%
|
85−90
+226%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−317%
|
150−160
+317%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
−158%
|
180−190
+158%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 19
−242%
|
65−70
+242%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 50−55
−258%
|
190−200
+258%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 13
−346%
|
55−60
+346%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
−244%
|
55−60
+244%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−343%
|
30−35
+343%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−233%
|
40−45
+233%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−241%
|
75−80
+241%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−271%
|
60−65
+271%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−437%
|
100−110
+437%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
−350%
|
90−95
+350%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 21−24
−241%
|
75−80
+241%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14
−329%
|
60−65
+329%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−550%
|
24−27
+550%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−250%
|
21−24
+250%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−216%
|
60−65
+216%
|
| Valorant | 9−10
−233%
|
30−33
+233%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−350%
|
35−40
+350%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−333%
|
12−14
+333%
|
| Dota 2 | 28
−114%
|
60−65
+114%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12
−309%
|
45−50
+309%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−373%
|
50−55
+373%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−246%
|
90−95
+246%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9−10
−233%
|
30−33
+233%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
This is how T500 Mobile and RX 6600S compete in popular games:
- RX 6600S is 233% faster in 1080p
- RX 6600S is 233% faster in 1440p
- RX 6600S is 253% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600S is 1260% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 6600S is ahead in 42 tests (66%)
- there's a draw in 22 tests (34%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.67 | 31.14 |
| Recency | 2 December 2020 | 4 January 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 80 Watt |
T500 Mobile has 344.4% lower power consumption.
RX 6600S, on the other hand, has a 259.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 6600S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6600S is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
