RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Quadro T500 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T500 Mobile with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

T500 Mobile
2020
2 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
7.89

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms T500 Mobile by a whopping 760% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53520
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency35.3178.13
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU117GB203
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date2 December 2020 (4 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8968960
Core clock speed1365 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate94.92374.4
Floating-point processing power3.037 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs56280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cache896 KB8.8 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA7.512.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−733%
300−350
+733%
1440p15
−700%
120−130
+700%
4K17
−724%
140−150
+724%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
−711%
300−310
+711%
Far Cry 5 30
−733%
250−260
+733%
Fortnite 50−55
−684%
400−450
+684%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−711%
300−310
+711%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−740%
210−220
+740%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−733%
250−260
+733%
Valorant 85−90
−724%
700−750
+724%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
−711%
300−310
+711%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−740%
1100−1150
+740%
Dota 2 90
−733%
750−800
+733%
Far Cry 5 28
−757%
240−250
+757%
Fortnite 50−55
−684%
400−450
+684%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−711%
300−310
+711%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−740%
210−220
+740%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
−739%
260−270
+739%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−733%
250−260
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−757%
240−250
+757%
Valorant 85−90
−724%
700−750
+724%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−711%
300−310
+711%
Dota 2 75
−700%
600−650
+700%
Far Cry 5 27
−752%
230−240
+752%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−711%
300−310
+711%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−733%
250−260
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−742%
160−170
+742%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
−684%
400−450
+684%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−746%
550−600
+746%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−746%
110−120
+746%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Valorant 90−95
−751%
800−850
+751%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
−742%
160−170
+742%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−750%
170−180
+750%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
−733%
150−160
+733%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14
−757%
120−130
+757%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Valorant 40−45
−695%
350−400
+695%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Dota 2 28
−757%
240−250
+757%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%

This is how T500 Mobile and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 733% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 700% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 724% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.89 67.89
Recency 2 December 2020 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 70 Watt

T500 Mobile has 288.9% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has a 760.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 112 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T500 Mobile or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.