Radeon Pro W6400 vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

T2000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5
20.63
+0.4%

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking247248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation4.6967.73
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN19P-Q3Navi 24
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$2221 $206

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W6400 has 1344% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed1575 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1785 MHz2331 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2111.9

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro W6400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.63
+0.4%
Pro W6400 20.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T2000 Mobile 7985
+0.4%
Pro W6400 7955

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Hitman 3 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Hitman 3 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Hitman 3 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Hitman 3 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 20.63 20.55
Recency 27 May 2019 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 50 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro T2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro W6400.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 284 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.