GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	287	156
Place by popularity	not in top-100	14
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	24.51
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	N19P-Q3 MAX-Q	GA106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$249
Current price	no data	$385 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Core clock speed	930 / 1200 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1500 / 1620 MHz	1777 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 - 40 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	103.7	142.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Max-Q and GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	242 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Max-Q 17.90

RTX 3050 8 GB 32.59
+82.1%

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 82% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T2000 Max-Q 6927

RTX 3050 8 GB 12612
+82.1%

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 82% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 −72.4%	100−110 +72.4%
1440p	26 −73.1%	45−50 +73.1%
4K	38 −71.1%	65−70 +71.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

−78.6%

50−55
+78.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 −79.2%	95−100 +79.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −77.4%	55−60 +77.4%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −66.7%	100−105 +66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −73.9%	80−85 +73.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −80.9%	85−90 +80.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	58 −72.4%	100−105 +72.4%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −77.4%	110−120 +77.4%
Hitman 3	50−55 −76.5%	90−95 +76.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −71.1%	65−70 +71.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −72.4%	50−55 +72.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	56 −78.6%	100−105 +78.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −76.5%	60−65 +76.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45 −77.8%	80−85 +77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −77.4%	55−60 +77.4%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −66.7%	100−105 +66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −73.9%	80−85 +73.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −80.9%	85−90 +80.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	55 −81.8%	100−105 +81.8%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −77.4%	110−120 +77.4%
Hitman 3	50−55 −76.5%	90−95 +76.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −71.1%	65−70 +71.1%
Metro Exodus	33 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −72.4%	50−55 +72.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45 −77.8%	80−85 +77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 −74.6%	110−120 +74.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −76.5%	60−65 +76.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 −80%	45−50 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −77.4%	55−60 +77.4%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −66.7%	100−105 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −80.9%	85−90 +80.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	50 −80%	90−95 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −77.4%	110−120 +77.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −76.5%	60−65 +76.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −73.1%	45−50 +73.1%
Hitman 3	27−30 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −73.9%	40−45 +73.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −79.5%	70−75 +79.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −76.5%	60−65 +76.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −80.6%	65−70 +80.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Hitman 3	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −75%	35−40 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −80%	45−50 +80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%

This is how T2000 Max-Q and RTX 3050 8 GB compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 8 GB is 72% faster in 1080p
RTX 3050 8 GB is 73% faster in 1440p
RTX 3050 8 GB is 71% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.90	32.59
Recency	27 May 2019	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	130 Watt