RTX A4500 vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
19.43

RTX A4500 outperforms T1200 Mobile by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking28545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency75.0319.49
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)23 November 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10247168
Core clock speed855 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate91.20369.6
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s640.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−176%
160−170
+176%
1440p33
−188%
95−100
+188%
4K81
−184%
230−240
+184%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−181%
90−95
+181%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−173%
120−130
+173%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
−177%
130−140
+177%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−177%
180−190
+177%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−181%
90−95
+181%
Far Cry 5 65
−177%
180−190
+177%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−183%
150−160
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−185%
350−400
+185%
Hitman 3 35−40
−182%
110−120
+182%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60
−183%
170−180
+183%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−183%
150−160
+183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 59
−188%
170−180
+188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
−178%
150−160
+178%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−173%
120−130
+173%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
−186%
80−85
+186%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−177%
180−190
+177%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−181%
90−95
+181%
Far Cry 5 59
−188%
170−180
+188%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−183%
150−160
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−185%
350−400
+185%
Hitman 3 35−40
−182%
110−120
+182%
Horizon Zero Dawn 47
−177%
130−140
+177%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−175%
190−200
+175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−183%
150−160
+183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44
−173%
120−130
+173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−182%
200−210
+182%
Watch Dogs: Legion 47
−177%
130−140
+177%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−173%
120−130
+173%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
−186%
60−65
+186%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−177%
180−190
+177%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−181%
90−95
+181%
Far Cry 5 56
−186%
160−170
+186%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−183%
150−160
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−185%
350−400
+185%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−170%
100−105
+170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
−163%
50−55
+163%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Hitman 3 21−24
−183%
65−70
+183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
−181%
90−95
+181%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−188%
95−100
+188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−183%
65−70
+183%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
−178%
50−55
+178%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−163%
100−105
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Far Cry 5 41
−168%
110−120
+168%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−183%
85−90
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−170%
300−310
+170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
−150%
30−33
+150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Hitman 3 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−182%
290−300
+182%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−178%
75−80
+178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 176% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 is 188% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 is 184% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.43 56.09
Recency 12 April 2021 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 200 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 1011.1% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 188.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 141 vote

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 190 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.