Quadro T1200 Mobile vs A10G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A10 PCIe A10G A40 PCIe CMP 90HX Quadro RTX 8100 Quadro RTX 8200 Quadro RTX A6000 RTX A40 RTX A4500 RTX A5000 RTX A5000-12Q RTX A5500
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared A10G with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

A10G
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
48.12
+150%

A10G outperforms T1200 Mobile by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

A10G A10G
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking72300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.2774.12
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA102TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores92161024
Core clock speed1320 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate492.591.20
Floating-point processing power31.52 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs28864
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1563 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth600.2 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA8.67.5
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+141%
58
−141%
1440p80−85
+142%
33
−142%
4K200−210
+147%
81
−147%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how A10G and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • A10G is 141% faster in 1080p
  • A10G is 142% faster in 1440p
  • A10G is 147% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 48.12 19.22
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 18 Watt

A10G has a 150.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has 733.3% lower power consumption.

The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that A10G is a workstation card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA A10G
A10G
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

A10G A10G
vs
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
A10G A10G
vs
L40S L40S
RX 7900 GRE RX 7900 GRE
vs
RX 6800 6800
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
RTX 4060 Ti Mobile 4060 Ti Mobile
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile 3050 Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile
Quadro P600 P600
vs
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 RTX 3060 12 GB GA104
vs
T1000 T1000
PRO W7900 PRO W7900
vs
Instinct MI250X Instinct MI250X
Arc A730M Arc A730M
vs
RX 6400 RX 6400
RTX 3060 GDDR6X RTX 3060 GDDR6X
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX 4080 Mobile RTX 4080 Mobile
vs
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 45 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A10G or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.