RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
19.96

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms T1200 Mobile by a whopping 229% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking25922
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameTU117AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)9 August 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10246144
Core clock speed855 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)130 Watt
Texture fill rate91.20417.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T1200 Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−228%
190−200
+228%
1440p33
−203%
100−110
+203%
4K81
−221%
260−270
+221%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−256%
30−35
+256%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−236%
47
+236%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−267%
65−70
+267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−256%
30−35
+256%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−261%
65
+261%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−231%
50−55
+231%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−237%
90−95
+237%
Hitman 3 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−233%
60
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−269%
59
+269%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−238%
54
+238%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−250%
28
+250%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−267%
65−70
+267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−256%
30−35
+256%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−269%
59
+269%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−231%
50−55
+231%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−237%
90−95
+237%
Hitman 3 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−236%
47
+236%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−267%
65−70
+267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−267%
44
+267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−238%
71
+238%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−236%
47
+236%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−250%
21
+250%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−267%
65−70
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−256%
30−35
+256%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−250%
56
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−231%
50−55
+231%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−237%
90−95
+237%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−270%
37
+270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−280%
19
+280%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
Hitman 3 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−256%
32
+256%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−230%
30−35
+230%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−242%
40−45
+242%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−283%
21−24
+283%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−280%
35−40
+280%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−242%
41
+242%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−300%
12
+300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Hitman 3 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−267%
21−24
+267%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 228% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 203% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 221% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.96 65.70
Recency 12 April 2021 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 130 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 30 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.