Arc Pro A30M vs Quadro T1200 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile and Arc Pro A30M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
T1200 Mobile outperforms Arc Pro A30M by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 300 | 359 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 74.12 | 20.92 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | TU117 | DG2-128 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 April 2021 (3 years ago) | 8 August 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,700 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 | 128.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.918 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 58
+28.9%
| 45−50
−28.9%
|
| 1440p | 33
+37.5%
| 24−27
−37.5%
|
| 4K | 81
+35%
| 60−65
−35%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+38.2%
|
55−60
−38.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65
+30%
|
50−55
−30%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+30.7%
|
75−80
−30.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+36.4%
|
55−60
−36.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+45.7%
|
35−40
−45.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+38%
|
50−55
−38%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+39%
|
100−105
−39%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+38.2%
|
55−60
−38.2%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
+32.4%
|
170−180
−32.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 114
+34.1%
|
85−90
−34.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 59
+31.1%
|
45−50
−31.1%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+30.7%
|
75−80
−30.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+36.4%
|
55−60
−36.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+45.7%
|
35−40
−45.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 71
+29.1%
|
55−60
−29.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+30%
|
30−33
−30%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+38%
|
50−55
−38%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 71
+29.1%
|
55−60
−29.1%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+39%
|
100−105
−39%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+38.2%
|
55−60
−38.2%
|
| Dota 2 | 107
+33.8%
|
80−85
−33.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 56
+40%
|
40−45
−40%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+36.4%
|
55−60
−36.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+38%
|
50−55
−38%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 37
+37%
|
27−30
−37%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 95−100
+30.7%
|
75−80
−30.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
+32%
|
100−105
−32%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 37
+37%
|
27−30
−37%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+27.8%
|
18−20
−27.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+38.1%
|
21−24
−38.1%
|
| Valorant | 170−180
+34.6%
|
130−140
−34.6%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+30%
|
40−45
−30%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 41
+36.7%
|
30−33
−36.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+31.4%
|
35−40
−31.4%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 40−45
+40%
|
30−33
−40%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+37.5%
|
24−27
−37.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+44.4%
|
18−20
−44.4%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+28.8%
|
80−85
−28.8%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+28.6%
|
21−24
−28.6%
|
| Dota 2 | 109
+28.2%
|
85−90
−28.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+42.9%
|
14−16
−42.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+33.3%
|
24−27
−33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+28.6%
|
14−16
−28.6%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 18−20
+28.6%
|
14−16
−28.6%
|
This is how T1200 Mobile and Arc Pro A30M compete in popular games:
- T1200 Mobile is 29% faster in 1080p
- T1200 Mobile is 38% faster in 1440p
- T1200 Mobile is 35% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.22 | 15.07 |
| Recency | 12 April 2021 | 8 August 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 50 Watt |
T1200 Mobile has a 27.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 177.8% lower power consumption.
Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro A30M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
