Arc A750 vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

Place in the ranking	291	179
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	56.35
Power efficiency	74.56	9.73
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	TU117	DG2-512
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	3584
Core clock speed	855 MHz	2050 MHz
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	91.20	537.6
Floating-point processing power	2.918 TFLOPS	17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	112
TMUs	64	224
Tensor Cores	no data	448
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 19.45

Arc A750 31.74
+63.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1200 Mobile 14387

Arc A750 37288
+159%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1200 Mobile 44135

Arc A750 98837
+124%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1200 Mobile 10134

Arc A750 29667
+193%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1200 Mobile 50827

Arc A750 130715
+157%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 −87.9%	109 +87.9%
1440p	33 −78.8%	59 +78.8%
4K	81 +125%	36 −125%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.65
1440p	no data	4.90
4K	no data	8.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%
Elden Ring	53 −58.5%	84 +58.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −46.8%	90−95 +46.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
Elden Ring	47 −59.6%	75−80 +59.6%
Far Cry 5	65 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Fortnite	100−110 −55.3%	160−170 +55.3%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −248%	285 +248%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −59.1%	210−220 +59.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −44.4%	65−70 +44.4%
Valorant	75−80 −59.5%	120−130 +59.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −46.8%	90−95 +46.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 −50%	21−24 +50%
Dota 2	114 +15.2%	99 −15.2%
Elden Ring	38 −184%	100−110 +184%
Far Cry 5	59 −15.3%	68 +15.3%
Fortnite	100−110 −43.7%	140−150 +43.7%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −191%	239 +191%
Grand Theft Auto V	71 −39.4%	99 +39.4%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −80.8%	94 +80.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −37.1%	180−190 +37.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −44.4%	65−70 +44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 −50.7%	100−110 +50.7%
Valorant	75−80 −59.5%	120−130 +59.5%
World of Tanks	220−230 −21.1%	270−280 +21.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −46.8%	90−95 +46.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Dota 2	107 −58.9%	170−180 +58.9%
Far Cry 5	56 −55.4%	85−90 +55.4%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −143%	199 +143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −37.1%	180−190 +37.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 −62.2%	60−65 +62.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

100−110

−55.3%

160−170
+55.3%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	30−35 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	37 −10.8%	41 +10.8%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −59.1%	70−75 +59.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Valorant	50−55 −60%	80−85 +60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −55%	60−65 +55%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	41 −141%	95−100 +141%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −190%	145 +190%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

50−55

−60%

80−85
+60%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring	14−16 −100%	27−30 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −36.4%	45 +36.4%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −207%	43 +207%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −66.7%	20−22 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −36.4%	45 +36.4%
Valorant	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Dota 2	109 −56%	170−180 +56%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −76%	40−45 +76%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −190%	84 +190%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −55.2%	90−95 +55.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

21−24

−52.2%

35−40
+52.2%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	88 +0%	88 +0%
Metro Exodus	116 +0%	116 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	75 +0%	75 +0%
Valorant	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	41 +0%	41 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
World of Tanks	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	54 +0%	54 +0%
Metro Exodus	86 +0%	86 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57 +0%	57 +0%
Valorant	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20 +0%	20 +0%
Dota 2	45 +0%	45 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Fortnite	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Valorant	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

Arc A750 is 88% faster in 1080p
Arc A750 is 79% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 125% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 15% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A750 is 248% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T1200 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (2%)
Arc A750 is ahead in 35 tests (64%)
there's a draw in 19 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.45	31.74
Recency	12 April 2021	12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	225 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 1150% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 63.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc A750 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.