GeForce GTX 1630 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	301	363
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.27	12.86
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N19P-Q1	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	28 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$1890	$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1630 has 201% better value for money than T1000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	512
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	69.84	57.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T1000 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Mobile 16.94
+31.1%

GTX 1630 12.92

Quadro T1000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T1000 Mobile 6540
+31%

GTX 1630 4991

Quadro T1000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 31% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	64 +42.2%	45−50 −42.2%
4K	48 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30
+50%

18−20

−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	48 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	53 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Far Cry 5	49 +40%	35−40 −40%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +31.4%	35−40 −31.4%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +31.7%	60−65 −31.7%
Hitman 3	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +34%	50−55 −34%
Metro Exodus	83 +38.3%	60−65 −38.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	67 +34%	50−55 −34%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Far Cry 5	41 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +31.4%	35−40 −31.4%
Forza Horizon 4	114 +34.1%	85−90 −34.1%
Hitman 3	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +34%	50−55 −34%
Metro Exodus	54 +35%	40−45 −35%
Red Dead Redemption 2	58 +45%	40−45 −45%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 +40%	45−50 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	29 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	32 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Far Cry 5	31 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +31.7%	60−65 −31.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +34%	50−55 −34%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50
+42.9%

35−40

−42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Hitman 3	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +41.7%	24−27 −41.7%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+33.3%

21−24

−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Hitman 3	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%