Radeon Vega 7 vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Max-Q with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

T1000 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
17.34
+132%

T1000 Max-Q outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking311526
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Power efficiency24.0211.48
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU117Cezanne
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896448
Core clock speed765 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate75.6053.20
Floating-point processing power2.419 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs5628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+117%
23
−117%
1440p80−85
+122%
36
−122%
4K45−50
+125%
20
−125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+144%
45−50
−144%
Hitman 3 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+146%
35−40
−146%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+144%
45−50
−144%
Hitman 3 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+146%
35−40
−146%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+144%
45−50
−144%
Hitman 3 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+146%
35−40
−146%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+135%
40−45
−135%
Hitman 3 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+133%
45−50
−133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Hitman 3 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+154%
35−40
−154%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%

This is how T1000 Max-Q and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is 117% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Max-Q is 122% faster in 1440p
  • T1000 Max-Q is 125% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.34 7.46
Recency 27 May 2019 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

T1000 Max-Q has a 132.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Vega 7 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1885 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.