RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Max-Q and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

T1000 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
15.93

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms T1000 Max-Q by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking367158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.4360.45
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameTU117GB206
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8963328
Core clock speed765 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1657 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate75.60172.3
Floating-point processing power2.419 TFLOPS11.03 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs56104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cache896 KB3.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA7.512.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−136%
130
+136%
1440p30−35
−130%
69
+130%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−120%
200−210
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−144%
80−85
+144%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−173%
80−85
+173%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
−82.6%
120−130
+82.6%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−120%
200−210
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−144%
80−85
+144%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−117%
110−120
+117%
Fortnite 90−95
−74.4%
150−160
+74.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−107%
130−140
+107%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−122%
110−120
+122%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−173%
80−85
+173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−138%
140−150
+138%
Valorant 130−140
−64.6%
210−220
+64.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
−82.6%
120−130
+82.6%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−120%
200−210
+120%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−32.4%
270−280
+32.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−144%
80−85
+144%
Dota 2 95−100
−122%
220−230
+122%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−117%
110−120
+117%
Fortnite 90−95
−74.4%
150−160
+74.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−107%
130−140
+107%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−122%
110−120
+122%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
−138%
145
+138%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−173%
80−85
+173%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−147%
80−85
+147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−138%
140−150
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−180%
120−130
+180%
Valorant 130−140
−64.6%
210−220
+64.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
−82.6%
120−130
+82.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−144%
80−85
+144%
Dota 2 95−100
−122%
220−230
+122%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−117%
110−120
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−107%
130−140
+107%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−173%
80−85
+173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−138%
140−150
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−180%
120−130
+180%
Valorant 130−140
−115%
280−290
+115%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
−74.4%
150−160
+74.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−175%
85−90
+175%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−111%
250−260
+111%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−226%
88
+226%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−160%
50−55
+160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−92.3%
300−310
+92.3%
Valorant 160−170
−53.4%
240−250
+53.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
−102%
90−95
+102%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−173%
40−45
+173%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−139%
85−90
+139%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−150%
100−105
+150%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−133%
40−45
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−175%
65−70
+175%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−151%
90−95
+151%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−153%
75−80
+153%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−146%
30−35
+146%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−143%
55−60
+143%
Valorant 90−95
−143%
210−220
+143%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−138%
55−60
+138%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−108%
27−30
+108%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Dota 2 55−60
−111%
120−130
+111%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−156%
45−50
+156%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−139%
65−70
+139%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−188%
45−50
+188%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%

This is how T1000 Max-Q and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 136% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 130% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 226% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile surpassed T1000 Max-Q in all 59 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.93 35.47
Recency 27 May 2019 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has a 122.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 18 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1000 Max-Q or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.