GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs Quadro RTX A6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX A6000 with GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

RTX A6000
2020
48 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
55.54

RTX 5070 Ti outperforms RTX A6000 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking507
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.1755.41
Power efficiency13.2719.16
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGA102GB203
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 October 2020 (4 years ago)20 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,649 $749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 5070 Ti has 355% better value for money than RTX A6000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores107528960
Core clock speed1410 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed1800 MHz2452 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate604.8686.6
Floating-point processing power38.71 TFLOPS43.94 TFLOPS
ROPs11296
TMUs336280
Tensor Cores336280
Ray Tracing Cores8470

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount48 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth768.0 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.612.0
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A6000 55.54
RTX 5070 Ti 80.21
+44.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A6000 22741
RTX 5070 Ti 32839
+44.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A6000 50957
RTX 5070 Ti 84984
+66.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX A6000 89510
RTX 5070 Ti 142486
+59.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A6000 27511
RTX 5070 Ti 63928
+132%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A6000 113167
RTX 5070 Ti 291378
+157%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A6000 494750
RTX 5070 Ti 868314
+75.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD158
−41.8%
224
+41.8%
1440p123
−8.1%
133
+8.1%
4K106
+20.5%
88
−20.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.42
−780%
3.34
+780%
1440p37.80
−571%
5.63
+571%
4K43.86
−415%
8.51
+415%
  • RTX 5070 Ti has 780% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti has 571% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti has 415% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 280−290
−16.5%
300−350
+16.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
−51.5%
200−210
+51.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
−64.9%
221
+64.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
−23.9%
190−200
+23.9%
Counter-Strike 2 280−290
−16.5%
300−350
+16.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
−51.5%
200−210
+51.5%
Far Cry 5 52
−527%
326
+527%
Fortnite 240−250
−23.8%
300−350
+23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−56.4%
300−350
+56.4%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
−36.2%
220−230
+36.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
−47.8%
198
+47.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−310
−67.3%
500−550
+67.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
−23.9%
190−200
+23.9%
Counter-Strike 2 280−290
−16.5%
300−350
+16.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
−51.5%
200−210
+51.5%
Dota 2 139
−43.9%
200−210
+43.9%
Far Cry 5 53
−485%
310
+485%
Fortnite 240−250
−23.8%
300−350
+23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−56.4%
300−350
+56.4%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
−36.2%
220−230
+36.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 128
−35.2%
170−180
+35.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
−32.8%
178
+32.8%
Metro Exodus 98
−146%
241
+146%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 307
−72.3%
529
+72.3%
Valorant 300−310
−67.3%
500−550
+67.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
−23.9%
190−200
+23.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
−51.5%
200−210
+51.5%
Dota 2 131
−37.4%
180−190
+37.4%
Far Cry 5 52
−465%
294
+465%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−56.4%
300−350
+56.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
−0.7%
135
+0.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180
−36.7%
246
+36.7%
Valorant 300−310
−67.3%
500−550
+67.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 240−250
−23.8%
300−350
+23.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
−64.3%
250−260
+64.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
−30%
500−550
+30%
Grand Theft Auto V 96
−65.6%
150−160
+65.6%
Metro Exodus 84
−82.1%
153
+82.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
−42.2%
450−500
+42.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−46.3%
190−200
+46.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−69.9%
120−130
+69.9%
Far Cry 5 52
−383%
251
+383%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−69.5%
290−300
+69.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
−47.8%
102
+47.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−69.2%
203
+69.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−64.8%
110−120
+64.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
−19.4%
180−190
+19.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−108%
79
+108%
Metro Exodus 70
−44.3%
101
+44.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
−30.1%
190
+30.1%
Valorant 300−350
−6.8%
300−350
+6.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−46.2%
130−140
+46.2%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−64.8%
110−120
+64.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−79.4%
60−65
+79.4%
Dota 2 128
−40.6%
180−190
+40.6%
Far Cry 5 50
−188%
144
+188%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−114%
260−270
+114%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−65.8%
63
+65.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how RTX A6000 and RTX 5070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti is 42% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti is 8% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A6000 is 20% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 5070 Ti is 527% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti is ahead in 55 tests (87%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 55.54 80.21
Recency 5 October 2020 20 February 2025
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm

RTX A6000 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 5070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 44.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX A6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 495 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1347 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX A6000 or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.